Environmental protection policy

Prompt/TOPIC:

Consider a specific environmental protection policy, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, or CERCLA (Superfund). What kind of information would enable you to determine how successful the policy has been?

–

NOTES:

Absolutely NO use of AI, must only be in HUMAN text!

Please make sure when quoting, they are DIRECT QUOTES with quotation marks and proper citation. In addition, sentences must be specific and backed up by book evidence. Only use information strictly from the book which will be in the following link.

INSTRUCTIONS:

I will provide a VIDEO LINK with the chapter 11 pages on it. 

LINK: 

You must answer the prompt using the following layout:, MUST BE 6 PARAGRAPH.

PLEASE STRICTLY FOLLOW THE LAYOUT!

Paragraph 1: intro/a clear thesis statement, which directly addresses the question(s) posed and gives readers an indication of the argument you plan to make; (MAKE SURE TO ADDRESS PROMPT QUESTION(s) and relate it to roadmap)

Paragraph 2: direct reference to the assigned materials (to illustrate your comprehension of the assigned materials); respond with thesis as well

Paragraph 3 and 4: (2 bodys) a body of factual examples/evidence that supports your thesis and develops your argument;

• 2 quotes/evidence per paragraph

Each quote must be embedded in a context sentence and finish with the quote. The quote must be a directed copy and paste with the citation (Kraft and Furlong Pg#).

• To be clear, you MUST reference the assigned materials using direct quotations, or cited, paraphrased passages, in order to receive full credit for your submission. Responses that don’t have substantial and significant references to the assigned materials (readings and/or videos) will receive a grade no higher than a D.

Paragraph 5: a coherent paragraph structure that emphasizes the main points of your argument and college-level English; and,in other words, you should have multiple paragraphs

• Paragraph 6: a succinct concluding paragraph.

These responses do not need to be lengthy essays, but they do need to be substantial and thoughtful and demonstrate your attempt to understand the cases and materials. If it appears that you are Googling answers or taking any other shortcuts (anything other than reading the materials and undertaking independent research), you may not receive credit.